Our neighbour built an extension touching our home… now we have to pay HER £130,000 and she can keep it up

[ad_1]

A millionaire couple sued their neighbor over a lawsuit after they were ordered to pay £130,000 after losing their case.

Liz Peck, who runs a gender-neutral organic children’s clothing business, and her singer-songwriter husband Adam Debbie Ranford accused of “trespassing” on her property in trendy East DulwichLondon.

4

A millionaire couple who took their neighbor to court over a roof extension have been charged with ‘using a hammer to crack a nut’.credit: Champion News
Liz and Adam Peck said they were horrified after an extension of 'trespass' at their home in London's trendy East Dulwich

4

Liz and Adam Peck said they were horrified after an extension of ‘trespass’ at their home in London’s trendy East Dulwichcredit: Champion News
But a judge has now favored Debbie Ranford instead - and said the damage she suffered would total £200.  Pays £130,000 to PEX to cover legal fees

4

But a judge has now favored Debbie Ranford instead – and said the damage she suffered would total £200. Pays £130,000 to PEX to cover legal feescredit: Champion News

Banker Ms. Rainford’s extension ended up just an inch from her own loft room – before the builder used infill material to join the two dormers together, he said.

And the furious couple claimed that the work cost them £1.5million. left a water leak in Property After a “big crack” appeared in the wall.

But a judge sitting at the Central London County Court has now ruled that although there was a “very minor” trespass, There is no need to demolish the work.

Pekes will now have to collect attorneys’ bills, which total around £130,000.

Millions of workers face pay cuts as 'real' wages fall at fastest rate in decade
Thousands asked to pay £150 council tax exemption after payment error

Judge Simon Monti QC said Peck should not have taken the case to a full county court trial—and agreed that he had attempted to use a “sledgehammer to crack a nut” over a minor boundary issue. .

During the trial, the court heard that banker Ms. Rainford had built a loft room in her two-story flat in south London’s affluent Bellenden Road in 2014 after getting the green light from Peakes.

The couple signed a ‘party wall notice’, which means they consented to the work.

However, Mrs Peck said she was horrified after learning that her neighbor’s builder had built a border line to make the room bigger.

“Given the party wall notice we signed, we had no reason to investigate the actions,” he told the court.

Mr Peck said: “It was quite a shock to understand and find out that something very different had been created.”

The couple’s barrister said the deed was “apparent trespass” on their property.

But Ms. Ranford said Peck had consented to her building atop the party wall.

She claimed that joining the rooms was “inevitable” and that no detail is on the couple’s side of the range.

Her barrister told the court that she had offered £13,000 to settle the case out-of-court – but the couple rejected her white flag.

In her ruling, Judge Monty acknowledged that Ms. Ranford’s producer had explained to Mrs. Peck that she intended to build on the party wall, but that she did not actually agree to it.

house about him

However, he said he would not order Mrs Ranford to pull down her loft extension as the resulting trespass was “very minor” and instead awarded £200 in damages to Peckes.

“I completely reject the case of Mr. and Mrs. Peck that the trespassing was cynical and calculated. On the facts, it was not,” he said.

“It is quite clear to me that Ms. Ranford was the successful party here.”

He ordered that the Pays pay their cost £70,000, and 80 per cent of their neighbour’s cost, which was estimated at around £72,000 before the trial.

I'm a Former Disney Employee—Customers Asking These Questions Are a Waste of Time
Mum explains how to get £549 Butlin's break for just £23.49 a night

However, that amount could be increased as they would now be assessed on a strict “compensation” basis.

In all, Pex’s final bill is likely to exceed £130,000.

Planning flaws mean you won’t need permission to build in the garden.

  • Building a Shed, Garden Home Office or Wendy’s House will not normally require planning permission – unless the structure is larger than 15 square meters, can sleep over or take up more than half the garden
  • The boundary fence should not exceed a maximum of 2 meters to avoid planning battles. If you live next to a highway the limit is 1m
  • If you are doing a large garden project such as uprooting a tree or building a concrete building, you may need permission for engineering work. Local authorities differ on their definitions, so if you have a big project in mind, it’s worth consulting with experts, lawyers — and possibly your neighbors — first.
  • You don’t need planning permission to replace unused space in your home or garden—but do keep in mind the rules for adding exterior windows or doors.
  • Permitted development rules mean you can build a one-storey extension – as long as it doesn’t exceed 4 meters tall. All you need is a pre-approval certificate, which costs £96. Is
Ms. Ranford, who lives in the house on the right, tried to settle with her neighbors before the matter came to court, then offered £13,000

4

Ms. Ranford, who lives in the house on the right, tried to settle with her neighbors before the matter came to court, then offered £13,000credit: Champion News



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Comment